LOUISVILLE, Ky. (WAVE) – The attorneys for Brooks Houck have submitted a request to have the Nelson Circuit Court Judge Charles Simms disqualified from overseeing the case.
Brian Butler and Michael Denbow claim Judge Charles Simms III claim Simms has demonstrated a bias toward Houck, who has been charged with the murder of his former girlfriend Crystal Rogers. The affidavit says the bias shown in court started years before Houck was criminally charged with the murder of Rogers, pointing to Simms’ commentary from a 2017 custody case, involving a different girlfriend of Houcks, Crystal Maupin.
Although he was not a party involved in the custody dispute, Houck’s attorneys argue Simm’s commentary in a written order issued six years ago called his impartiality into question. Simms wrote “… this Court is simply astonished that Crystal would want a relationship with a man [Brooks Houck] who is the prime suspect in the disappearance and presumed death of his previous girlfriend.”
When the order was entered in 2017, attorneys wrote Houck was a successful business owner without any criminal history other than some construction-related ordinance violations.
Houck’s $10 million bond was another example used by attorneys against Simms. The affidavit argued, “The grossly excessive $10,000,000 bond set in this case further bolsters the obvious concerns about his inability to be impartial and demonstrate his continuing bias against Mr. Houck.”
Prior to Houck’s court arraignment on Oct. 5, attorneys filed a motion to have the bond reduced. During the hearing, Butler defended the motion detailing Houck’s community ties, how he remained in Bardstown during the eight-year investigation into Rogers’ disappearance, surrendered without incident showing he is a low flight risk, and his lack of criminal history.
Following special prosecutor Shane Young’s argument in opposition to the motion to reduce Houck’s bond, Simms asked about information relating to other investigations to which Young said Houck’s brother Nick was being investigated for the murder of Rogers’ father Tommy.
Houck’s attorneys claim Simms asked the question “which he had clearly had been privy to since he presided over the grand jury as a basis to justify an oppressive and unconstitutional bond in this case.”
Ultimately, the request to reduce Houck’s $10 million bond was denied. Lawyer’s are asking the Kentucky Court of Appeals to overrule that bond decision.
Read the full affidavit below.
Copyright 2023 WAVE. All rights reserved.
Source link
Attorneys and law firms can elevate their online presence with professionally written content from SEO Content Writing Services monthly plan. Our team of experienced writers specializes in crafting blog posts, articles, and written content that accurately reflect the expertise and knowledge of our clients in the legal field. With a keen eye for detail and a thorough understanding of legal terminology, we provide high-quality writing that helps our clients stand out from their competition and engage with their target audience. Trust SEO Content Writing Services for one time article writing or monthly written content to handle all of your written content needs and showcase your law firm's expertise.
If you need written content, blog posts, or articles professionally written for your website, we can help. Go HERE to find out more.
or email us here: myseowritingservices@gmail.com
To find out more about our article writing or blog post services, fill out the form, thank you.